|
NEWS
RELEASE
Release: No.
02-EV/6;
Date Mailed:
July 9, 2002
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Elaine Zacky—208/265-8065;
800/336-9266
Emerging
Viruses Author Says the U.S. GAO Investigated the Wrong AIDS
Origin Theory
Sandpoint, ID — The
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) was led astray in disproving
a theory that the AIDS virus was created in a U.S. government
laboratory, according to the author who originally raised the
question Ohio Rep. James A. Traficant requested be studied last
July.
Congressman Traficant
ordered the GAO study following the urging of an HIV-positive
attorney and former Youngstown resident, Boyd E. Graves, who
persuaded the legislator that a flow chart accompanying lengthy
National Cancer Institute (NCI) “Special Virus Cancer Program” reports
was a “smoking gun.”
According to
Dr. Leonard Horowitz, the author of an American bestseller, Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola—Nature,
Accident or Intentional?(Tetrahedron Press, 1996), the
book that Graves credits for his “discovery” of the flow chart,
the primary question Graves raised, and GAO investigators asked,
was fundamentally absurd.
“Mr. Graves was
delusional when he conceived the notion that a single flow chart
represented definite proof that the AIDS virus had been constructed
by government contractors. Far more relevant questions would
have been, ‘How was it that HIV/AIDS was able to simultaneously
outbreak on two far removed continents, in two demographically
distinct populations, other than through contaminated vaccines?’ Most
scientists respect this question. Next, ‘Was there any links
between firms that used gay men in New York City and Blacks in
central Africa in the early to mid 1970s as subjects for questionable
cancer virus vaccine experiments, and the contamination of those
vaccines with HIV sequences or AIDS-like viruses found in the
laboratories that supplied chimpanzees used in the vaccine production
process?’ Evidencing the affirmative to these questions is absolutely
certain and definitive,” Dr. Horowitz said.
Dr. Horowitz’s
research of SVCP contracts proves that Litton Bionetics—a top
U.S. biological weapons contractor, monkey supplier for vaccine
producers, chief administrator of the NCI during the period in
question, and the principle overseer of the SVCP—was contracted
to produce numerous viruses that were descriptively and functionally
identical to the AIDS virus, HIV, as early as 1968. Whether their
viral productions were genetically similar to HIV is a matter
for serious inquiry.
Graves cited
a number of experts, including Dr. Horowitz, who he claimed supported
his case. However, according to Janet Heinrich, the GAO’s director
of health care and public health issues, none of the experts
actually supported Graves’s theory.
“Of course we
were unable to support Graves’s theory,” Dr. Horowitz said. “It
was bogus from the start, and I told him [Graves] so. What Graves
directed the government investigators to ask is, ‘Does the SVCP
flow chart prove that HIV/AIDS was manufactured by a government
lab?’ There were dozens of SVCP contracts that had nothing
to do with developing a “special virus” like HIV/AIDS. Some contracts did,
but they were not central to the GAO’s focus. Graves had everyone
focusing on a complex and largely unintelligible flow chart.
I told him from the beginning he was making a fatal error, that
his misdirection would help the GAO whitewash the matter, and
that his actions and GAO report would undermine future serious
scientific inquiries into the most revealing evidence. And that’s
precisely what has happened.”
Indeed, in an
interview published by States News Service (SNS), Heinrich made
light of the “conspiracy theory” advanced by Graves and said, “We
don't get many requests to pursue things of this nature.”
Among the contradicting
pieces of evidence for Traficant, SNS reported, “was the GAO’s
finding that HIV was found in blood samples of an African man
who died in1959. That predates the 1964 start of the virus cancer
program, the GAO report states.”
Dr. Horowitz
responded to this by saying, “the question about the 1959 strain,
as detailed by Zhu et al. as reported in Nature (February
5, 1998), reinforces, they wrote, ‘the role of large-scale vaccination
campaigns’ in the onset of AIDS. In fact, answers to the questions
most serious investigators might pose expose the sharing of contaminated
blood between those who received the monkey virus contaminated
polio vaccines in the 1950s and later the 1974 hepatitis B vaccine
partially produced in chimpanzees before gay men in New York
and African blacks. Litton Bionetics provided the link supplying
contaminated chimpanzees to the Merck Pharmaceutical Company
operating in New York labs. They produced the 1974 hepatitis
B vaccine given to gay men there and mostly women in central
Africa. This is most likely how the AIDS pandemic got started,
and these are the avenues of inquiry I urged the GAO investigators
to take when they questioned me.”
In fact, the
Merck pharmaceutical company, under scrutiny today for $12 billion
of financial improprieties, had leading scientists who knew their
vaccines were contaminated by monkey cancer viruses. They did
little or nothing to stop Merck’s production. In a secreted interview
published by Dr. “Horowitz ‘On
Vaccines,” (Tetrahedron, LLC, 1998; 1-888-508-4787) Dr. Maurice
Hilleman—among the world’s leading vaccine experts—explains how
he brought the AIDS virus to north America in shipments of contaminated
primates destined for vaccine research at Merck. His admissions
fit precisely with Dr. Horowitz’s findings. (To hear this revealing,
if not stunning, audio segment CLICK HERE.)
Dr. Horowitz
believes his theory best explains the occurrence of what Dr.
Gerald Myers, chief of the special HIV Sequence Database AIDS
Project of the U.S. Government’s Los Alamos Laboratory, called
the “Big Bang” of the mid-1970s when he identified the sudden
simultaneous emergence of numerous types of HIV around the world
at that time.
In his book,
Dr. Horowitz reviewed dozens of viral vaccine studies conducted
by a narrow network of virologists working for major military–medical
contractors under the auspices of the National Cancer Institute
(NCI) and the World Health Organization (WHO). The text details
bizarre and horrifying experiments, many done in conjunction
with the biological weapons race of the 1960s and early 1970s
when Litton Bionetics officiated the development of countless
immune system ravaging viruses, and supplied monkeys and chimpanzees
to firms that developed an assortment of antidote vaccines for
the Department of Defense and cancer studies.
In the end of
his book Dr. Horowitz concludes that the speculation regarding
HIV’s evolution and subsequent transmission from African green
monkeys, or even chimpanzees, in the wild to humans, as government
officials first contended and most people believe, is grossly
unsupported. “Far more consideration should be given to a growing
body of scientific evidence supporting a man-made origin, and
vaccine transmission, of HIV/AIDS,” he says. “The greatest problem
now is that, for all we know since we have yet to determine its
origin, HIV may still be transmitting through contaminated vaccines.”
-end –
NOTE TO JOURNALISTS: Emerging
Viruses: AIDS and Ebola—Nature, Accident or Intentional?,
is distributed by leading booksellers and currently published
by Tetrahedron, LLC (1-888-508-47878). For an in-depth article
on Dr. Horowitz’s investigative research, or for a review
copy of this book, please call Elaine Zacky at 800/336-9266.
Dr. Horowitz’s rebuttal to the 1959 case cited by Zhu et
al in Nature, is available at: http://www.tetrahedron.org/articles/aids-coverups/David_Ho_Paper_Nature_Rebuttal.html.
Click the link
Below to Listen to a related audio archive from Dr. Horowitz’s
nationally broadcast “Insight Hour”
http://www.tetrahedron.org/ra/Boydeedgraves.ram .
For anyone interested,
instead of being investigated by the U.S. Congress for his likely
role in delivering HIV/AIDS to the world through contaminated
vaccines, President Clinton awarded Dr. Maurice Hilleman the
1997 Sabin Gold Medal of Honor Award—the most esteemed medal
in American medicine.
*************************************************************** |